Philosophical Theories of Sport

Philosophical theories on sport can be either normative or descriptive. The former seeks to provide an accurate account of the central concepts of sport, whereas the latter aims to give guidance on appropriate standards of behavior within a specific sport. The first type of theory, internalist in nature, draws from structuralism and Marxism. William J. Morgan distinguished three types of externalist theories: formalism, conventionalism, and broad internalism. The latter is more philosophical in nature and focuses on the lived experiences of athletes.


In addition to its competitive nature, sport involves many other activities, such as relaxation and health. The primary objective of sport is to increase physical abilities and skills. In addition to providing entertainment to the participants and spectators, it can also improve one’s physical health. There are hundreds of different types of sports, including individual and team competitions, recreational activities, and social sports. Although most sports involve only one contestant, some involve hundreds or even thousands of competitors.

In general, rules and customs define right and wrong behaviour in sport. These rules ensure fair competition and consistent adjudication of the winner. While physical events determine the winner, judges are used to score different elements of a sporting performance. These measurements are objective or subjective. For example, a teammate can have a better score than a player with the same handicap. This is another example of unfairness in sport. In any case, a team member may have more than one equal chance of winning.

A common goal in all sports is to improve the performance of players. While the best teams may be the most talented, sport is still a game. A game that requires a significant investment of time and money isn’t going to win you a game. A sport governed by rules is likely to be more competitive. Its objective nature makes it attractive to a large audience. Therefore, it is important to follow the rules and regulations in any sport.

Michael Brown defines sport as a competitive event. In his definition, sports are games that are defined by their rules. In addition to rules, a game can be called a sport if two or more people participate in it. A sports competition should be fair to both parties. A game must also be fair to all participants. If one team loses the game, it should be able to win. The winner should be fair to the other team as well.

The definition of sport is different from the other. Some consider it to be a physical activity and not a religion. Some people consider it as an act of worship and are not religious. While others see it as a means of communication, both types of games are ruled by rules and can be a form of exercise. It is difficult to imagine a world without sports. A person can play multiple sports and enjoy several different sports. Some may be involved in one or more of them.

Related Posts